Books I am reading
That monumental meeting in 1972–during what Nixon called “the week that changed the world”–could have been brought about only by powerful leaders: Nixon himself, a great strategist and a flawed human being, and Mao, willful and ruthless.
They were assisted by two brilliant and complex statesmen, Henry Kissinger and Chou En-lai. Surrounding them were fascinating people with unusual roles to play, including the enormously disciplined and unhappy Pat Nixon and a small-time Shanghai actress turned monstrous empress, Jiang Qing.
And behind all of them lay the complex history of two countries, two great and equally confident civilizations: China, ancient and contemptuous yet fearful of barbarians beyond the Middle Kingdom, and the United States, forward-looking and confident, seeing itself as the beacon for the world.
Nixon thought China could help him get out of Vietnam. Mao needed American technology and expertise to repair the damage of the Cultural Revolution. Both men wanted an ally against an aggressive Soviet Union.
Did they get what they wanted? Did Mao betray his own revolutionary ideals? How did the people of China react to this apparent change in attitude toward the imperialist Americans? Did Nixon make a mistake in coming to China as a supplicant? And what has been the impact of the visit on the United States ever since?
- Pricing your art theartjunket.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/pri… via @wordpressdotcom 1 week ago
- RT @kyotojournal: Yahoo Co-Founder Gives $25 Million to San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum buff.ly/2fWS01F https://t.co/pojRpp2ZX4 2 months ago
- mailchi.mp/9a75a2841772/j… 2 months ago
- @evankleiman @nancyhachisu Congratulations on your new book! 2 months ago
- I entered the @GolfNow #DrivewithDJSweepstakes with Dustin Johnson. You can also enter here: golfnowdrivewithdustin.com 3 months ago
5 Myths about Project Based Learning units
This article in “Edutopia” has a good list of the fears that we teachers have before we embark on a Project Based Learning unit (in many ways similar to a Service Learning unit). I have some experience using Project Based and Service Learning (see earlier posts under Project Based Learning).
I am an advocate of this method of teaching and feel that this method of teaching is an effective way to help students think creatively, feel ownership in their learning, and help students develop skills necessary for education and life (authentic learning).
However, I think the amount of time it takes to complete one of these projects is problematic. For those of us who face standardized testing – requiring students to cover a large amount of information (in my case, IB History exams), these projects need to be truncated to the point of being merely a sound bite of an experience. What do you think?